戒烟过程中社会管制及社会支持的交互作用

2014/11/05

   摘要
   背景:
社会管制和社会支持均对戒烟过程有一定影响,但其通常都是被分开来单独研究的。
   目的:研究社会管制和社会支持在戒烟过程是否存在协同作用。
   方法:在99例吸烟者中,评估试验者决定戒烟前两周所接受的社会管制及情感支持(均特异性针对吸烟者)(T1),决定戒烟6周后再次客观地评估其戒烟状况及试验者自己报告的每日吸烟数(T2)。
   结果:两种结局均显示社会管制的功能是受社会支持调节的,但是有益的协同作用(高强度社会管制/高强度社会支持)仅体现有少数试验者中。低强度社会管制/高强度社会支持与较差的戒烟效果相关,而低强度社会管制/低强度社会支持则与较好的戒烟效果相关。
   结论:结合使用不同程度的社会管制和社会支持可能更利于戒烟,虽然同时进行高强度的社会管制和高强度的社会支持可能利于戒烟,但在现实中很少存在这样的情况。

 

(刘国梁 审校)
Ann Behav Med. 2014 Sep 12. [Epub ahead of print]



 


Interacting Effects of Receiving Social Control and Social Support During Smoking Cessation.
 

Ochsner S1, Knoll N, Stadler G, Luszczynska A, Hornung R, Scholz U.
 

ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Social control and support have effects on smoking cessation, but are mostly examined separately.
PURPOSE: Interacting effects of social control and support are investigated, hypothesizing synergistic effects.
METHODS: In 99 smokers, received social control and emotional support (both smoking specific) were assessed 2 weeks before a quit date (T1); objectively verified abstinence and self-reported numbers of cigarettes smoked daily were assessed 6 weeks after baseline (T2).
RESULTS: For both outcomes, associations with control (T1) were moderated by support (T1), but beneficial synergistic effects (high control/high support) emerged for few participants only. Effects were mainly driven by constellations of low control/high support associated with more cigarettes smoked daily (T2) and low control/low support linked to higher likelihood of abstinence (T2).
CONCLUSIONS: Different constellations of levels of control and support may be beneficial for quitting smoking. Whereas synergies of high domain-specific control and support may be beneficial, they only rarely occur.

 

Ann Behav Med. 2014 Sep 12. [Epub ahead of print]


上一篇: 通过合作学习以促进使用综合护理法帮助有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人戒烟
下一篇: 嚼槟榔在台湾工人戒烟中的作用

用户登录